Cache used from Hummingbird vs Siteground build in

Hello, i’m wondering if you are familiar with the siteground build in cacher with 3 levels. Static cache, dynamic cache and memcache. Is it better to use the hummingbird plugin?

  • Predrag Dubajic
    • Support

    Hey Jacy,

    Hope you’re doing well :slight_smile:

    I know that SiteGround offers its own caching options but I can’t say that I used that much and don’t know how it compares to Hummingbird caching.

    I do believe (not 100% sure) that SiteGround caching is server side and it doesn’t include browser side caching options, so you should keep the Browser Caching enabled in Hummingbird and focus on page caching.

    Pretty much best way is to try using one without the other and see what results you are getting and keep the one that performs better for you.

    When possible it’s best to test things on your own in order to get the first hand results for your specific site and see what works best for you.

    Best regards,


Thank NAME, for their help.

Let NAME know exactly why they deserved these points.

Gift a custom amount of points.