Andy thanks for the response! Looking forward to that update, I'll stay tuned.

A few issues I have with this setup, as just tested with a site: - Not all images that could be served as WebP are being served as WebP, whereas other implementations seem to achieve that. - The CDN is smush branded, this is bad for SEO. Can't see any way to apply your own branding i.e. serve under a subdomain. - No speed improvement, in fact potentially slightly slower due to additional DNS lookup. Maybe that's counteracted by the smaller image file size... but then what's the point? Please let me know if I'm wrong on any of the above. I'd love to utilize WebP, but it doesn't seem like Smush would be the best way to do that.

Funnily enough, with Stackpath enabled, you can't even turn on the Smush CDN - just tested on a few sites with and without Stackpath integrations, and on the Stackpath sites the Smush CDN activation just keeps spinning. Surely we should be able to utilize WebP outside of the Smush CDN?

Hi Andri, Thanks, but can we use WebP without the CDN? We use Stackpath and have no interest in using this CDN...

Hey Adam, Thanks, this is what we were looking for! Worked perfectly. Tom

Edit: We are now using the below, as it seems the newer shortcodes are cleaner: [app_monthly_schedule require_service="1" service="1,2,3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17" required_service_message="Please, select an activity."] [app_confirmation] From reading the documentation it looks like we may not be able to use multiple IDs - any other ideas? https://premium.wpmudev.org/docs/wpmu-dev-plugins/appointments-shortcode-reference/

Hi Adam, Thanks for the quick response - although not ideal, this would probably get the job done. It doesn't seem to be working though, as all services are still displayed on the frontend. Here's the code: <table> <tbody> <tr> <td>[app_services]</td> </tr> <tr class="booking-month"> <td colspan="2">[app_monthly_schedule service="1,2,3,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17"]</td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2">[app_pagination month="1"]</td> </tr> <tr class="confirmation"> <td colspan="2">[app_confirmation]</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> Are we able to use an array of IDs like that? Are there any other issues here? Could we be doing this better somehow?

Did anything ever get done about this? If we need to be able to block off, for example, 6 hours, and our normal max booking time is 1 hour - do we really have to create 6x 1 hour bookings?